In CRM, we do have an OOTB functionality which lets you
check for duplicates. This would however, would not stop one from saving the
record but letting know the operator that there is a duplicate. This is in a
way good as it, lets the operator decide whether to use the existing record or
to continue with using a new record.
There are some good features of this as well as there are
some limitations.
Main limitations are
- You can have only 5 published duplicate detection rules per entity
- The combination of the match code cannot exceed 450.
If you want a new rule and the entity has exceeded the rule
limitation, then you would have to unpublish one rule and get this created. For
on premise CRM instances you can change this, but it is unsupported. For Online
instances, the unsupported cannot be done.
For Match code though you have alternatives. However, this
might not always work, but would be good to know them as well.
For an instance when you create a record for contact and if
you want to check for duplicates using first name, last name and street 1, the
match code length becomes 352. Now it would be difficult for you to add couple
more fields as you only have spare 98 length left from 450.
Most of the time street1 length would not exceed for a live
record more than 50(Depends on the requirement). If this is the case then what
we can do is instead of having the criteria as “Exact Match”, we can have the filter as “Same First Characters” and give a character length of 50. By doing
this we can reduce the match code from 352 to 152, which allows us to add more
fields if required.
Apart from that, you do have the operator “Same Last Characters” and can give the
character length too.
Also one good thing about this is you can check against
another different entity as well. If you need to check when creating a lead
record, whether there are contact records with a matching criteria this is also
possible.
Apart from that you can check for the following as well.
- Case sensitiveness of characters
- Include/Exclude inactive records
- Ignore blank records
No comments:
Post a Comment